d923aa1e31
Hopfield + Hebbian hybrid memory system for LLMs. Two nights of experiments (16 iterations), validated on LongMemEval (ICLR 2025). Architecture: - Single-hop: Two-Stage Hopfield (NN top-20 → softmax settle) - Multi-hop: Hebbian W matrix with WTA pattern separation - 64% on LongMemEval (500 questions), retrieval-only, no LLM dependency - 4ms latency @ 20K memories, ~1GB VRAM Key findings: - Hopfield attention solved noise tolerance (20% → 100% vs flat Hebbian) - WTA pattern separation enables 20K+ capacity - Multi-hop associative chains (6 hops, CosSim=1.0) — RAG can't do this - MiniLM-L6 is optimal (discrimination gap > absolute similarity) - Paraphrase cue augmentation: 55% → 100% on synthetic, 36% → 64% on benchmark - SNN encoder viable (CosSim 0.99) but not needed for current architecture
53 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
53 lines
1.9 KiB
Markdown
# P2: Auto Paraphrase Generation
|
||
|
||
## 核心数据
|
||
|
||
| 策略 | bg=0 | bg=500 | bg=2000 | 实现难度 |
|
||
|------|------|--------|---------|---------|
|
||
| None | 95% | 65% | 55% | - |
|
||
| Heuristic (synonym swap) | 95% | 85% | **75%** | 零成本 |
|
||
| Oracle (hard cases only) | 100% | 95% | **95%** | 需 LLM |
|
||
| Oracle (全覆盖) | 100% | 100% | **100%** | 需 LLM |
|
||
|
||
## 发现
|
||
|
||
1. **Heuristic 已经很有价值**：55% → 75%（+20pp），不需要 LLM
|
||
2. **Oracle 全覆盖 = 100%**：证明问题完全可通过 paraphrase 解决
|
||
3. **大部分 failure 可被 paraphrase 修复**：9 个 failure 中 8 个有 oracle fix
|
||
|
||
## Failure 分类
|
||
|
||
| 类型 | 例子 | 原因 | 修复方式 |
|
||
|------|------|------|---------|
|
||
| 词汇鸿沟 | "Ship the release" ↔ "deploy" (cos=0.46) | 完全不同的词 | LLM paraphrase ✓ |
|
||
| 概念映射 | "Need observability" ↔ "monitoring" (cos=0.26) | 抽象→具体 | LLM paraphrase ✓ |
|
||
| 领域知识 | "Fix login issue" ↔ "auth bug" (cos=0.65) | 需要知道 login=auth | LLM paraphrase ✓ |
|
||
| 竞争 | "DB terrible" ↔ "DB slow" (cos=0.72) 但被 bg 抢走 | cos 够高但 bg 更近 | 增加 augmentation 密度 |
|
||
|
||
## 实际部署策略
|
||
|
||
### 存储时（异步，不影响延迟）
|
||
```
|
||
1. 用户说了一句话
|
||
2. 提取 (cue, target)
|
||
3. 同步存原始 cue
|
||
4. 异步：LLM 生成 3-5 个 paraphrase → 追加存入
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
### Heuristic fallback（LLM 不可用时）
|
||
当前 heuristic 规则已验证有效（+20pp），可以作为 baseline：
|
||
- 去除常见前缀 ("Can you", "I need to", "How do I")
|
||
- 同义词替换 (deploy↔release, database↔DB, fix↔resolve)
|
||
- 添加 "issue with X" 模式
|
||
|
||
### LLM Prompt（待 Gateway 恢复后验证）
|
||
```
|
||
Generate 3-5 different ways a user might say this:
|
||
"The database is slow again"
|
||
|
||
Requirements:
|
||
- Same core meaning, different wording
|
||
- Include informal/colloquial versions
|
||
- Include technical jargon alternatives
|
||
```
|